Screener
HTEC vs IXN
Robo Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.29% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than HTEC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HTEC | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2019 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +63.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.2% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.27% | 21.62% |
| Max drawdown | -57.53% | -36.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HTEC and IXN
Explore further