Screener
HYBB vs CLOA
iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares AAA CLO Active ETF
Key differences
- CLOA is significantly larger than HYBB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYBB follows a index tracking strategy; CLOA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, HYBB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYBB | CLOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $424M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 6.07% | 5.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 2.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.32% | 0.72% |
| Max drawdown | -15.27% | -1.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYBB and CLOA
Explore further