Screener
HYDB vs MEAR
iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.09% less per year.
- HYDB follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, HYDB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYDB | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 7.11% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.0% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.82% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -21.58% | -2.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYDB and MEAR
Explore further