Screener
HYLS vs ICSH
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.61% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than HYLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while ICSH is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, HYLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.56% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and ICSH
Explore further