Screener
HYLS vs SCHO
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF vs Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.66% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than HYLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HYLS is classified as alternative, while SCHO is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- HYLS follows a long short strategy; SCHO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HYLS | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $12.5B |
| Since | 2013 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 6.65% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.56% | 1.38% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -5.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HYLS and SCHO
Explore further