Screener
SCHO vs TUA
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF vs Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- SCHO costs 0.22% less per year.
- SCHO is significantly larger than TUA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCHO is classified as fixed income, while TUA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SCHO follows a index tracking strategy; TUA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCHO | TUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12.5B | $802M |
| Since | 2010 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | -1.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | -2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.20 | -0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.38% | 6.85% |
| Max drawdown | -5.69% | -15.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SCHO and TUA
Explore further