Screener
IALT vs ISMF
iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.19% less per year.
- IALT is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IALT follows a systematic alpha strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| IALT | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $57M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IALT and ISMF
Explore further