Screener
IALT vs IMF
iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.34% less per year.
- IALT follows a systematic alpha strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| IALT | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $301M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -15.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IALT and IMF
Explore further