Screener
IBAT vs IWM
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.28% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBAT covers global markets; IWM covers north america.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and IWM
Explore further