Screener
IBAT vs IXC
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.07% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +117.7% | +53.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.82% | 18.44% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and IXC
Explore further