Screener
IBAT vs MXI
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Global Materials ETF
Key differences
- MXI costs 0.08% less per year.
- MXI is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | MXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $325M |
| Since | 2024 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +117.7% | +31.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.82% | 19.38% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and MXI
Explore further