Screener
IBAT vs IXUS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.40% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBAT covers global markets; IXUS covers global ex us.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | IXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $56.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 2.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | +32.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | 15.40% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -36.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and IXUS
Explore further