Screener
IBAT vs SOLR
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Sustainable Energy ETF
Key differences
- IBAT costs 0.32% less per year.
- IBAT is significantly larger than SOLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | SOLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $5M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | +42.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | 19.35% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -39.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and SOLR
Explore further