Screener
IBAT vs TEK
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF
Key differences
- IBAT costs 0.28% less per year.
- IBAT follows a index tracking strategy; TEK uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | TEK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $37M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | +64.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | 25.50% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -28.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and TEK
Explore further