Screener
IBAT vs BDYN
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.07% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBAT is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IBAT follows a index tracking strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
- BDYN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and BDYN
Explore further