Screener
IBLC vs ACWX
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Key differences
- ACWX costs 0.15% less per year.
- ACWX is significantly larger than IBLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while ACWX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $11.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.5% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.9% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.29% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -35.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and ACWX
Explore further