Screener
IBLC vs ACWI
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- ACWI costs 0.15% less per year.
- ACWI is significantly larger than IBLC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC is classified as alternative, while ACWI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $31.3B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +76.5% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.9% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.29% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -33.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and ACWI
Explore further