Screener
IBLC vs BPAY
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs iShares FinTech Active ETF
Key differences
- IBLC costs 0.08% less per year.
- IBLC is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBLC follows a index tracking strategy; BPAY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBLC | BPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $9M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +67.1% | -5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.6% | +9.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 55.35% | 25.59% |
| Max drawdown | -62.54% | -33.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBLC and BPAY
Explore further