Screener
IBOT vs ARKQ
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.28% less per year.
- ARKQ is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IBOT follows a index tracking strategy; ARKQ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ARKQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ARKQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | ARKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.3% | +76.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.95% | 32.38% |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -59.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and ARKQ
Explore further