Screener
IBRN vs IHF
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- IHF costs 0.09% less per year.
- IHF is significantly larger than IBRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IBRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBRN | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $777M |
| Since | 2022 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.8% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.00% | 21.56% |
| Max drawdown | -35.39% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBRN and IHF
Explore further