Screener
ICLN vs CGXU
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.15% less per year.
- ICLN follows a index tracking strategy; CGXU uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGXU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | CGXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $5.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 4.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +87.9% | +37.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.93% | 19.73% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -25.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and CGXU
Explore further