Screener
ICLN vs QCLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.20% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than QCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICLN covers global markets; QCLN covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, QCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLN | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $739M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +87.9% | +118.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.93% | 34.72% |
| Max drawdown | -66.75% | -71.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICLN and QCLN
Explore further