Screener
QCLN vs FRNW
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund vs Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- FRNW costs 0.20% less per year.
- QCLN is significantly larger than FRNW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QCLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QCLN | FRNW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $739M | $141M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +118.3% | +95.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.72% | 25.46% |
| Max drawdown | -71.73% | -59.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QCLN and FRNW
Explore further