Screener
IDGT vs BILT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
- IDGT costs 0.21% less per year.
- IDGT is significantly larger than BILT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDGT follows a index tracking strategy; BILT uses active selection.
- IDGT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDGT | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $26M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +59.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.15% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.88% | -5.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDGT and BILT
Explore further