Screener
IDRV vs MOTO
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- IDRV costs 0.20% less per year.
- IDRV is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDRV follows a index tracking strategy; MOTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDRV | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $161M | $10M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.0% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.7% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.73% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -53.00% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDRV and MOTO
Explore further