Screener
MOTO vs FDRV
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
Key differences
- FDRV costs 0.29% less per year.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; FDRV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | FDRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $28M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +46.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 24.94% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -63.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and FDRV
Explore further