Screener
IDVZ vs DIVB
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs iShares Core Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DIVB costs 0.70% less per year.
- DIVB is significantly larger than IDVZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDVZ covers global markets; DIVB covers north america.
- IDVZ follows a active selection strategy; DIVB uses index tracking.
- DIVB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDVZ | DIVB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.4% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.89% | 11.34% |
| Max drawdown | -10.99% | -36.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDVZ and DIVB
Explore further