Screener
IEFA vs ACWI
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.25% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than ACWI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEFA covers global ex us markets; ACWI covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, ACWI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEFA | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180.7B | $31.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.03% | 12.84% |
| Max drawdown | -34.79% | -33.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEFA and ACWI
Explore further