Screener
IEFA vs EASG
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.07% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEFA covers global ex us markets; EASG covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IEFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IEFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEFA | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180.7B | $67M |
| Since | 2012 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.03% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -34.79% | -32.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEFA and EASG
Explore further