Screener
IEFA vs EZU
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.43% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EZU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEFA covers global ex us markets; EZU covers global.
- EZU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEFA | EZU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180.7B | $9.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.03% | 16.93% |
| Max drawdown | -34.79% | -41.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEFA and EZU
Explore further