Screener
IEFA vs MCHI
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.52% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than MCHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IEFA covers global ex us markets; MCHI covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, IEFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEFA | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $180.7B | $6.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.1% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.07% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -34.79% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEFA and MCHI
Explore further