Screener
MCHI vs EFA
iShares MSCI China ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.27% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than MCHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MCHI covers emerging markets markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHI | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $75.6B |
| Since | 2011 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.0% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -62.84% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCHI and EFA
Explore further