Screener
IEMG vs MCHI
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.50% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than MCHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IEMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEMG | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151.2B | $6.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.6% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.35% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -38.71% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEMG and MCHI
Explore further