Screener
IFGL vs RAAX
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF vs VanEck Real Assets ETF
Key differences
- IFGL costs 0.21% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than IFGL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IFGL is classified as equity, while RAAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IFGL follows a index tracking strategy; RAAX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFGL | RAAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $905M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.68% | 1.93% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.4% | +37.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.5% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.4% | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.68% | 13.64% |
| Max drawdown | -40.38% | -33.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFGL and RAAX
Explore further