Screener
RAAX vs REET
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs iShares Global REIT ETF
Key differences
- REET costs 0.55% less per year.
- REET is significantly larger than RAAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RAAX is classified as alternative, while REET is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RAAX follows a active selection strategy; REET uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | REET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2018 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 3.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.4% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +10.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.64% | 12.05% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -44.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and REET
Explore further