Screener
IFLO vs ULVM
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF vs VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
Key differences
- ULVM costs 0.36% less per year.
- IFLO covers global markets; ULVM covers north america.
- ULVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFLO | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $168M | $249M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -6.44% | -40.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFLO and ULVM
Explore further