Screener
IFLO vs USVM
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF vs VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
Key differences
- USVM costs 0.27% less per year.
- USVM is significantly larger than IFLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IFLO covers global markets; USVM covers north america.
- USVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFLO | USVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $168M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -6.44% | -42.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFLO and USVM
Explore further