Screener
IFRA vs GII
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IFRA costs 0.10% less per year.
- IFRA is significantly larger than GII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IFRA covers north america markets; GII covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GII has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFRA | GII | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.1B | $989M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 2.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.8% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.6% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 10.60% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -42.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFRA and GII
Explore further