Screener
IFRA vs IWR
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.12% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than IFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IFRA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IFRA | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.1B | $52.6B |
| Since | 2018 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.8% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.6% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.79% | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -40.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IFRA and IWR
Explore further