Screener
IGCB vs FLXR
TCW Corporate Bond ETF vs TCW Flexible Income ETF
Key differences
- IGCB costs 0.05% less per year.
- FLXR is significantly larger than IGCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGCB is classified as fixed income, while FLXR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IGCB follows a index tracking strategy; FLXR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGCB | FLXR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2018 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 5.66% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.3% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.02% | 2.27% |
| Max drawdown | -4.20% | -1.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGCB and FLXR
Explore further