Screener
IGF vs BIDD
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares International Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.20% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BIDD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF follows a index tracking strategy; BIDD uses active selection.
- BIDD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | BIDD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $438M |
| Since | 2007 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 2.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 15.27% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -15.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and BIDD
Explore further