Screener
IGF vs BKCH
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.11% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF covers global markets; BKCH covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $314M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +108.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +61.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 70.40% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and BKCH
Explore further