Screener
IGF vs EFRA
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.08% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than EFRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | EFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $6M |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.43% | 14.03% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and EFRA
Explore further