Screener
IGF vs IGEB
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Investment Grade Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGEB costs 0.21% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than IGEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF is classified as equity, while IGEB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- IGF covers global markets; IGEB covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | IGEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 5.03% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 4.23% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -21.13% |
Similar to IGF and IGEB
Explore further