Screener
IGF vs SLQD
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.33% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than SLQD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF is classified as equity, while SLQD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- IGF covers global markets; SLQD covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -12.69% |
Similar to IGF and SLQD
Explore further