Screener
IGF vs IXUS
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 0.32% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than IGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF covers global markets; IXUS covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | IXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $56.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 2.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.43% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -36.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and IXUS
Explore further