Screener
IGF vs POWR
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF covers global markets; POWR covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | POWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | — |
| Since | 2007 | — |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +16.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -63.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and POWR
Explore further