Screener
IGF vs REET
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global REIT ETF
Key differences
- REET costs 0.25% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGF | REET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.7B | $4.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 3.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +10.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 12.05% |
| Max drawdown | -42.11% | -44.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGF and REET
Explore further