Screener
REET vs RIFR
iShares Global REIT ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- REET costs 0.45% less per year.
- REET is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REET follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
- REET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REET | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.8B | $42M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.9% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.05% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -44.59% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REET and RIFR
Explore further