Screener
IGPT vs HERO
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF vs Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
Key differences
- HERO costs 0.06% less per year.
- IGPT is significantly larger than HERO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGPT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGPT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGPT | HERO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $875M | $71M |
| Since | 2005 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +119.4% | -10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +42.7% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.6% | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.32 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.47% | 19.61% |
| Max drawdown | -50.14% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGPT and HERO
Explore further